Help with assignments
This is a two-part assignment. Use the Learning Theories Comparison [DOCX] worksheet to complete the assignment.
- First complete the theory comparison in the worksheet.
- Once you complete the theory comparison, complete the self-evaluation chart within the same worksheet. Reflect on your performance on the rubric criteria for the assignment to complete the self-evaluation.
Submit your worksheet for grading once you have completed both Part 1 and Part 2. The detailed instructions for both parts are below.
Part 1: Theory Comparison
- Identify Learning Theories: Identify the specific learning theories that need to be compared. Common learning theories might include behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, social learning theory, etc.
- Fill in the Comparison Chart:
- Name of Theory: Write the names of the theories you’re comparing.
- Key Concepts: Outline the main concepts and principles of each theory.
- Founders: List the key figures associated with each theory.
- Application in Education: Explain how each theory is applied in educational settings.
- Strengths: Highlight the strengths or advantages of each theory.
- Weaknesses: Discuss the limitations or disadvantages of each theory.
- Examples: Provide examples of how each theory can be used in practice.
Here’s an example template to get you started:
| Criterion | Theory 1: Behaviorism | Theory 2: Constructivism |
|---|---|---|
| Name of Theory | Behaviorism | Constructivism |
| Key Concepts | Learning as a change in behavior, reinforcement, punishment | Learning as an active process, learners construct knowledge |
| Founders | B.F. Skinner, John Watson | Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky |
| Application in Education | Use of rewards and punishments to shape behavior | Use of hands-on activities, collaborative learning |
| Strengths | Clear structure, effective for behavior modification | Promotes critical thinking, adapts to individual learning styles |
| Weaknesses | Ignores internal thought processes, limited to observable behaviors | Can be time-consuming, requires skilled facilitation |
| Examples | Token economy systems, drill and practice exercises | Group projects, problem-based learning |
Part 2: Self-Evaluation
- Reflect on Rubric Criteria: Carefully review the rubric criteria for the assignment. Reflect on how well you met each criterion. Consider aspects such as clarity, depth of analysis, accuracy, and thoroughness.
- Complete the Self-Evaluation Chart:
- Criteria: List the criteria from the rubric.
- Self-Assessment: Rate your performance on each criterion (e.g., Excellent, Good, Fair, Needs Improvement).
- Comments: Provide comments explaining your self-assessment. Reflect on what you did well and areas where you could improve.
Here’s an example template for the self-evaluation chart:
| Criterion | Self-Assessment (Rating) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness of Comparison | Excellent | Thoroughly compared key aspects of both theories. |
| Clarity and Organization | Good | Information is well-organized but could be more concise in some areas. |
| Depth of Analysis | Fair | Analysis is adequate but lacks in-depth exploration of examples. |
| Use of References | Excellent | Incorporated multiple credible sources to support the comparison. |
Final Submission
Once you’ve completed both parts:
- Review Your Work: Ensure that the information is accurate, well-organized, and clearly presented.
- Save the Document: Save your worksheet as a DOCX or PDF file as per the submission guidelines.
- Submit the Worksheet: Submit the completed worksheet to your instructor for grading.