Choose a state and review the scope of practice for the advanced practice nurse. How does it compare to Florida?
Submission Instructions:
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
- You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
- All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
- Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
- You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Title: Scope of Practice for Advanced Practice Nurses in Florida and New York
Introduction
The scope of practice for advanced practice nurses (APNs) varies from state to state in the United States due to differences in state regulations and statutes governing healthcare providers. In this essay, we will compare the scope of practice for APNs in Florida and New York, two states that have distinct regulations in this regard. Florida’s scope of practice for APNs is relatively restrictive compared to New York’s more progressive approach, allowing for a deeper examination of how these differences affect the roles and responsibilities of APNs in each state.
Florida’s Scope of Practice for Advanced Practice Nurses
Florida, like many other states, requires APNs to obtain national certification and state licensure to practice. However, Florida’s scope of practice for APNs is relatively limited compared to some other states. Florida law categorizes APNs into two main categories: nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). NPs in Florida have limited prescribing authority, requiring a protocol agreement with a supervising physician. CNSs are also required to collaborate with physicians and have restrictions on prescribing medication. Additionally, Florida law does not recognize nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) as independent practitioners, further limiting their scope of practice.
Furthermore, Florida law mandates that APNs must practice under the supervision of a physician. This means that APNs in Florida often work in collaborative or team-based settings with physicians, and their practice is influenced by the physician’s oversight. While this can be beneficial for patient care in some cases, it limits the autonomy and independent practice of APNs.
New York’s Scope of Practice for Advanced Practice Nurses
New York, on the other hand, has a more progressive approach to the scope of practice for APNs. The state recognizes four categories of APNs: nurse practitioners (NPs), clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), nurse midwives (CNMs), and nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). New York has implemented a “collaborative agreement” model rather than a “supervision” model for NPs, which grants them more autonomy in their practice. NPs in New York have full prescriptive authority, including the ability to prescribe controlled substances.
CNSs, CNMs, and CRNAs in New York also enjoy a broader scope of practice compared to their counterparts in Florida. CNSs can diagnose and treat medical conditions independently, CNMs can provide prenatal care and attend deliveries, and CRNAs can administer anesthesia without the direct supervision of a physician.
Comparison between Florida and New York
The comparison between Florida and New York highlights the significant differences in the scope of practice for APNs in these two states. New York’s more progressive approach allows APNs to practice more independently, provide a wider range of services, and have full prescriptive authority. This approach aligns with the Institute of Medicine’s recommendation to maximize the use of APNs to address healthcare workforce shortages and improve access to care, especially in underserved areas.
In contrast, Florida’s more restrictive scope of practice for APNs may create barriers to healthcare access, particularly in rural areas where there is a shortage of healthcare providers. The requirement for physician supervision can lead to delays in patient care and hinder the efficiency of healthcare delivery.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the scope of practice for advanced practice nurses varies significantly from state to state, as illustrated by the differences between Florida and New York. While Florida has a more restrictive regulatory environment that limits the autonomy and independence of APNs, New York’s progressive approach grants APNs greater authority and responsibility in patient care. These differences have important implications for the healthcare workforce, patient access to care, and the delivery of healthcare services. It is essential for policymakers to consider the potential benefits of expanding APNs’ scope of practice, as demonstrated by New York, to enhance healthcare delivery and improve patient outcomes.