According to the textbook, when deciding to target a behavior for reduction, we should think about unwanted behavior as “contextually inappropriate behavior” (CIB). By providing examples, explain why a behavior is not good or bad by nature? What are the implications of CIB?
When we talk about behavior in terms of “contextually inappropriate behavior” (CIB), we emphasize that a behavior’s appropriateness or inappropriateness depends on the context in which it occurs, rather than the behavior itself being inherently good or bad. This perspective helps us understand that the same behavior can be acceptable in one situation but inappropriate in another, highlighting the importance of context in behavior assessment. Let’s explore this concept with some examples:
- Talking Loudly:
- Contextually Appropriate: Cheering loudly at a sports event.
- Contextually Inappropriate: Talking loudly in a library.
In a sports event, loud cheering is a sign of enthusiasm and support for the team, which is encouraged and seen as positive behavior. However, in a library, the same loud talking would disrupt others who are trying to concentrate, making it inappropriate.
- Running:
- Contextually Appropriate: Running during a soccer game.
- Contextually Inappropriate: Running in a hospital corridor.
Running is essential and encouraged in sports like soccer, where it is a part of the game and necessary for performance. Conversely, running in a hospital corridor can be dangerous, potentially causing accidents or disturbing patients, thus it is inappropriate.
- Joking and Laughing:
- Contextually Appropriate: Joking and laughing during a social gathering with friends.
- Contextually Inappropriate: Joking and laughing during a formal business meeting.
Social gatherings are meant for relaxation and enjoyment, where joking and laughing contribute to the fun atmosphere. In a formal business meeting, such behavior can be seen as unprofessional and distracting from the purpose of the meeting.
Implications of CIB
Understanding behavior as CIB has several important implications:
- Tailored Interventions: When addressing unwanted behavior, it is crucial to consider the context in which it occurs. This approach allows for more tailored interventions that modify the environment or situation to make the behavior appropriate rather than attempting to eliminate the behavior entirely.
- Reduced Stigma: Viewing behaviors as contextually inappropriate rather than inherently bad reduces the stigma associated with certain actions. This perspective encourages understanding and empathy, recognizing that behaviors may need to be redirected rather than judged.
- Holistic Approach: This approach encourages looking at the broader picture, considering environmental, situational, and cultural factors that influence behavior. It promotes a holistic understanding of why certain behaviors occur and how they can be managed effectively.
- Adaptive Behavior: Recognizing CIB promotes adaptive behavior. It helps individuals learn when and where certain behaviors are appropriate, fostering better social functioning and adaptability.
- Positive Reinforcement: This perspective allows for the use of positive reinforcement to encourage appropriate behavior in the right contexts. For example, rewarding a child for using an indoor voice in the classroom but allowing louder play during recess.
In summary, behaviors are not inherently good or bad; their appropriateness is determined by the context. By understanding and addressing behavior as CIB, interventions can be more effective, reduce stigma, and promote adaptive and contextually appropriate behavior.